Also known as Adjudications Specialist, Adjudicator, Administrative Hearings Officer, Administrative Judge, Administrative Law Judge, Appeals Examiner, Appeals Referee, Claims Adjudicator, Hearings Officer, Workers' Compensation Hearings Officer
Also known as Adjudications Specialist, Adjudicator, Administrative Hearings Officer
Administrative Judges conduct hearings to recommend or make decisions on claims concerning government programs or other government-related matters.
In addition, Administrative Judges determine liability, sanctions, or penalties, or recommend the acceptance or rejection of claims or settlements.
Administrative Judges are often responsible for overseeing or executing some or all of the following tasks:
The above responsibilities are specific to Administrative Judges. More generally, Administrative Judges are involved in several broader types of activities:
The median salary for an Administrative Judge is $97,520, and the average salary is $102,050. Both the median and average roughly describe the middle of the Administrative Judge salary range, but the average is more easily affected by extremely high or low salaries.
Many Administrative Judges earn significantly more or less than the average, due to several factors. About 10% of Administrative Judges earn less than $47,580 per year, 25% earn less than $65,260, 75% earn less than $131,790, and 90% earn less than $180,910.
Between the years of 2020 and 2030, the number of Administrative Judges is expected to change by 0.6%, and there should be roughly 700 open positions for Administrative Judges every year.
Career interests describe a person's preferences for different types of working environments and activities. When a person's interest match the demands of an occupation, people are usually more engaged and satisfied in that role.
Compared to most occupations, those who work as an Administrative Judge are usually higher in their Enterprising, Investigative, and Social interests.
Administrative Judges typically have very strong Enterprising interests. Enterprising occupations frequently involve starting up and carrying out projects. These occupations can involve leading people and making many decisions. Sometimes they require risk taking and often deal with business.
Also, Administrative Judges typically have strong Investigative interests. Investigative occupations frequently involve working with ideas, and require an extensive amount of thinking. These occupations can involve searching for facts and figuring out problems mentally.
Lastly, Administrative Judges typically have moderate Social interests. Social occupations frequently involve working with, communicating with, and teaching people. These occupations often involve helping or providing service to others.
People differ in their values, or what is most important to them for building job satisfaction and fulfillment.
Compared to most people, those working as an Administrative Judge tend to value Achievement, Recognition, and Working Conditions.
Most importantly, Administrative Judges strongly value Achievement. Occupations that satisfy this work value are results oriented and allow employees to use their strongest abilities, giving them a feeling of accomplishment.
Second, Administrative Judges strongly value Recognition. Occupations that satisfy this work value offer advancement, potential for leadership, and are often considered prestigious.
Lastly, Administrative Judges strongly value Working Conditions. Occupations that satisfy this work value offer job security and good working conditions.
Each occupation brings its own set of psychological demands, which describe the characteristics necessary to perform the job well.
In order to perform their job successfully, people who work as Administrative Judges must consistently demonstrate qualities such as integrity, self-control, and attention to detail.
Below, you'll find a list of qualities typically required of Administrative Judges, ranked by importance:
Many Administrative Judges have earned a graduate degree. For example, they may require a master's degree, and some require a doctoral degree, such as a Ph.D., M.D., or J.D..
Administrative Judges may need some on-the-job training, but most candidates will already have the required skills, knowledge, work-related experience, and/or training.
Administrative Judges may benefit from understanding of specialized subject areas, such as law and government, customer and personal service, or administrative knowledge.
The list below shows several areas in which most Administrative Judges might want to build proficiency, ranked by importance.
Administrative Judges must develop a particular set of abilities to perform their job well. Abilities are individual capacities that influence a person's information processing, sensory perception, motor coordination, and physical strength or endurance. Individuals may naturally have certain abilities without explicit training, but most abilities can be sharpened somewhat through practice.
For example, Administrative Judges need abilities such as oral comprehension, written comprehension, and inductive reasoning in order to perform their job at a high level. The list below shows several important abilities for Administrative Judges, ranked by their relative importance.
Skills are developed capacities that enable people to function effectively in real-world settings. Unlike abilities, skills are typically easier to build through practice and experience. Skills influence effectiveness in areas such as learning, working with others, design, troubleshooting, and more.
Administrative Judges frequently use skills like reading comprehension, active listening, and critical thinking to perform their job effectively. The list below shows several critical skills for Administrative Judges, ranked by their relative importance.
The information provided on this page is adapted from data and descriptions published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration under the CC BY 4.0 license. TraitLab has modified some information for ease of use and reading, and the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment, and Training Administration has not approved, endorsed, or tested these modifications.
If you have any questions or suggestions about this information, please send a message.